Wednesday, January 1, 2020

Labor in The Office - Pilot

It’s my understanding Ricky Gervais was involved with the production of the first 3 episodes of The Office. As far a I know he was a writer for the pilot as well. From an ignorant couch potato perspective, I can say it certainly looks to be consistent with the other episodes. I guess it would make sense. It is his show, after all. Regardless of the writers and producers involved, the pilot introduces the viewers to themes which would be consistently addressed throughout the entire series.

The choice of Scranton, Pennsylvania is ideal. A working-class city which has already shouldered its share of deindustrialization would provided a good stage for a series taking place just before and during the economic downturn of the Great Recession. Additionally, Dunder Mifflin, the company the show focuses on, is confronting technological changes on two different fronts. Not only was paper becoming less important for businesses as electric communication and record keeping became more prevalent, big-box stores were stealing market share from smaller businesses. In other words, The Office takes place in a time and place where the exploitation of workers was great and it provides an ideal canvass to portray working-class problems. Mr. Gervais, if you’re ever unfortunate enough to read my ramblings, I’d like to pitch a series about the Luddites. They dealt with related problems. Well, at least they were contending with exploitation and technology changes. I doubt they had as clean hair.

One of the topics dealt with series-wide is embodied by the character, Ryan. Ryan is a contract, or “temp,” employee. Temporary employees are part of what is now referred to as the Precariate – people whose employment exists in a precarious state (precarious + proletariat = precariate) and, as a result are vulnerable to degrees of exploitation against which regular employees are better shielded. For example, members of the precariate have lower compensation and little or no health insurance coverage – making them more susceptible to wage theft and other forms of exploitation because interruptions to their income are much more destructive. Members of the precariate typically have little to no savings or safety net and are much less likely to be able to stand up for themselves simply because, as individuals, they have little to no power over their working conditions and can’t risk getting fired.

As the viewers are introduced to Ryan, they are also made aware Dunder Mifflin is downsizing. One would be right to ask, “Why is the company downsizing on one hand while bringing on temp workers on the other?” Good question. Does or doesn’t the work need to be done? Truth is the work needs to be done but Dunder Mifflin doesn’t want to pay for it. By contracting out temp employees instead of maintaining it’s workforce or hiring another employee, they free themselves of having to pay health insurance, unemployment insurance and other things afforded to regular employees under labor law. Plus, disposing of temp employees they might find problematic, for whatever reason – trivial or serious, is almost as simple as replacing a used printer cartridge. Humans become an expendable resource. Protections were won for workers by unions and through a history of conflict between the working-class and capitalists who seek to exploit their labor. Dunder Mifflin is looking to take its workforce back to the state experienced during the “Golden Era” (of exploitation) when capitalists like Andrew Carnegie treated their employees like chattel with few or no protections. People had to die for there to be an eight hour work day.

On-the-job abuse is distinctly evident. Although he would go on to be developed into a more likable character, Michael, the Branch Manager, is revealed to be an abusive boss. While job-site abuse can take many forms – and will throughout the series – Michael’s misogyny is front and center in the pilot. When Michael introduces the receptionist, Pam, her response to his sexist and insulting behavior clearly indicates she is not in a position to correct it nor does it appear he’d be willing or able to hear the criticism. If the office was unionized all the workers would have had means to take collective action on Pam’s behalf. Whether through a grievance process or direct action, she and her fellow workers would be able to confront Michael and ultimately put an end to it. His misogyny isn’t confined to his subordinates, either. We learn he has a problem with having a female superior during his meeting with Jan (which includes a call from the character, Packer, that includes the portmanteau “Godhillary”). I’d certainly be negligent if I also didn’t point out Michael misgenders someone as he’s initially introduced to the audience. For women, having him as a supervisor must be a nightmare. Regrettably, the women in office suffer from an endemic problem.

Another theme throughout the entire series is what I like to call the “friend-boss.” Michael reinforces multiple times how he wants to be perceived as a friend before he’s seen as a boss. While the idea of a friendly supervisor is appealing, a friend-boss is often used tactically to prevent improving working conditions, solidarity actions, or unionization. Various forms of the friend-boss range from so-called “open door” policies to outright emotional manipulation. In Michael’s case, we observe invasion of personal space, inappropriate jokes, and confusing informal/interpersonal venting about pay as a work-related discussion – to which he reacts poorly. In The Office, Michael is seen as someone who doesn’t recognize boundaries. In the real world, when boundaries between work and home-life are blurred, rarely do things work with the home-life creeping into work-life. It always goes the other way. Ask anyone who telecommutes, has to carry a company phone, or is required to answer calls and respond to emails regardless of time of day or what they might be doing (not to mention those ensnared in the “gig” economy). Friend-bosses see no problem in invading their employees personal time. After all, aren’t they all family? This dynamic is significant in the series. While it makes for entertaining television, it isn’t good for a healthy work/life balance.

Racism and institutional sexism also rear their ugly heads. As there are ample opportunities to discuss them further in other episodes, I’ll only mention their presence. I’ll also point out both can be protected against through worker solidarity and unionization. If you see something in the episode you feel is noteworthy or if there is something you would like me to focus on for other episodes, feel free to contact me at @unionlegion on Twitter or email me at union.legion (at) nym.hush.com.

Up next: Diversity Day

Friday, December 27, 2019

Introducing: the Labor in The Office Project

The Office is a beloved sitcom which focuses on the day-to-day interactions of a branch office for Dunder Mifflin, a fictional paper supplier. While based on the original British sitcom created by Ricky Gervais, the U.S. version went on for a longer run and deviated from the original's story line.

Having introduced the series to my child, I guess I'm responsible for it's being played non-stop in our household for the, oh, last two years. While I had initially noted a number of various and obvious issues in the series that address a variety of working-class topics, after having now seen every episode of the show 30 or 100 times and after looking online and seeing little or no examination of the show from the labor perspective, I've decided to compile and episode by episode critical review of the labor-related topics encountered. It is a forgone conclusion each episode is absurd and hilarious so I'm going to assume the reader finds them to be funny. I'll probably piss on that parade and be more serious than I probably should be.

C'est la vie. It's all Latin to me.

As my review progresses, we will encounter several recurring topics which, if encountered in the real world, would be solved through unionization and worker solidarity.

Some resources:

Wednesday, January 9, 2013

Buy American -- By Choosing What You Eat

Snack machine at work
Know what you're eating
As Americans, we are often assaulted by messages of all kinds about our dietary choices.  Whether it is some corporation trying to sell us food on the television or a local food activist distributing pamphlets at the farmer's market, these messages can often be frustrating and annoying.  If you're trying to support the economy of the United States by purchasing "Made in America" merchandise, you might assume that food sold or made in America is entirely "American."  If you're talking about locally-grown food, you'd be correct.  However, foods sold in discount supermarkets and processed foods made domestically may be or may contain ingredients manufactured outside the United States of America.

In this day and age, it is crucial consumers educate themselves and read the labels on the foods they purchase.  By doing so, they'd easily learn that stores like Wal-mart and discount groceries like Save-A-Lot sell foods grown or manufactured outside the United States.  I'm not talking about bananas or citrus fruit either.  For example, a recent trip to a Save-A-Lot revealed a startling number of canned fruits and vegetables from China!  There is no reason we should be importing food from China that can and is grown in America.  One specific example which comes to mind are canned peaches.  While American canned peaches were stocked, Save-A-Lot had surrounded them with discount "gourmet" peaches and "snack packs" from China.  Other Chinese imported foods observed were holiday cookies and candies.  Corporations like Save-A-Lot are trying to adapt the Wal-mart model of selling cheap merchandise made in China to retail food.  Isn't it bad enough we've handed over our manufacturing to Chinese wage-slave factories?  By buying these food products, you are endorsing the destruction of our agriculture by an economy predicated upon captive and forced labor -- not to mention their questionable safety record.  Remember all those babies who died after they were poisoned by contaminated baby formula?

Read the label!

While seeing "Made in China" on your can of peaches or maraschino cherries is easy enough -- if you take the time to look -- many processed foods made in America contain ingredients sourced outside the United States.  Even such "all American" snacks like Twinkies and Little Debbie cakes use these foreign ingredients and, if you're serious about buying American, you may want to keep what follows in mind.  Sorbic acid is a very common ingredient.  Flip over your snack and see if it's listed.  Sorbic acid is imported from Germany, Japan, and China.  Vanillin is an artificial vanilla flavoring.  It's made in one of two plants -- one in China and one in Baton Rouge, LA.  Neither of the plants is American owned.  At least one of them is in the States.  Palm oil is used a lot because of its excellent shelf life.  The palm oil tree can not grow in the United States and the vast majority is produced in Malaysia.  Stearic acid and sodium steryl lactylate are made from palm oil so, you guessed it, they're from Malaysia too.  Glycerin is added to foods to keep them moist or creamy.  Most of it comes from Mexico or Malaysia.  Same goes for mono and diglycerides.  Sodium and calcium casinate are common ingredients in many convenience foods.  Almost all of both of these ingredients originate in Ireland or New Zealand.

Flip over the package of your favorite snack cake or junk food and there is a very good chance you'll encounter more than one of these pro-globalization anti-American labor ingredients.  I'm of the opinion that processed foods made in the United States with ingredients from halfway around the world by a multinational corporation are not only of questionable nutritional value for your body but also that of the country as a whole.  Be informed when you make your purchases.  Junk food isn't necessarily bad -- if you don't eat too much of it -- but why are we clogging our national arteries or developing "all American" obesity and diabetes with foreign ingredients?  Just for the record, the following "food" ingredients are made from crude oil or national gas:  sorbic acid (a two-fer), polysorbate 60, 80, & 20, many artificial sweeteners, red #40 and yellow $5.  OPEC, Russia, China, and Norway profit when you dig into those.  Enjoy.

What's the solution?  The easiest I think is self apparent.  Buy locally produced foods -- preferably non-processed foods -- and cook for yourself.  Unfortunately, not everyone can do that.  What is most important is to educate yourself and learn where your food is coming from and then make informed pro-American labor choices.  Not only can you improve your health but also that of the country.  Buy American food made from American ingredients by American workers!

Wednesday, December 12, 2012

Michigan's Governor and Republicans in the Legislature are Contemptable Greedy Bastards

If something is wrong...The branch of the Republican party typified by the Koch brother and the high rollers who funded the oligarch, Mitt Romney's, failed run for President of the United States of America see the writing on the wall.  They are on their way out and their true-believer free market religion is sick and may die as it's recognized for what it truly is -- a plan for serfdom of the common citizen wrapped in the framed myth of "individual liberties" and "freedom" (without having much to do with either.  Why do I think this?  Because the Republicans in Michigan are behaving like angry feral cats that are trapped and about to be neutered.  They are striking out and clawing as hard as possible at the source, as they see it, of resistance -- the Unions.

The paradigm is changing.  We've heard about it since the re-election of President Barack Obama.  The make up of the population is changing.  Unfortunately for conservatives and other plutocrats, the shift in the population is favoring Progressive issues such as marriage equality, abortion rights, pot legalization, the election of non-white Presidents, and Labor rights.  In the case of the Michigan Republicans, the last election didn't work out all that well for them and Democrats, who are generally more pro-Union, picked up seats while Republicans lost.  While the Republicans currently have a super-majority in the Michigan State Legislature, they will loose that single party dictatorship in January.  Their back is against the wall and they have chosen to do as much damage as possible to their largest progressive opponents.  Not only have Unions stood for the Middle Class (having had a significant hand in creating it) and all workers, they are willing to put their money where their mouth is by funding politicians who support Labor.  As many Republicans have been bankrolled by corporations or have bought the party line meant to benefit management, most Union money goes to Democrats who do support workers' issues.  So, in Michigan, they moved to eliminate one of the greatest accomplishments of American Society and that of the world as a whole.  The so called "right to work" law is not about economics.  It is not about giving workers choice.  It's about politics and nothing more.  The Republicans see their position is eroding and they are trying to do as much damage as possible before they loose control by starving or bankrupting the Unions.

What about Rick Snyder, Michigan's Governor?  Either he's a coward or he's been lying to the citizens of Michigan.  His past statements are more than adequate to demonstrate his hypocrisy on this issue -- having both said he wanted nothing to do with it and that his signing of the "right to work" law would be too divisive for Michigan.  Within the last week, he has entirely reversed the positions he supposedly previously held and signed the anti-Union bill the moment it was rammed through the legislature without public comment and under extremely questionable circumstances.  He is nothing but an enemy of the Middle Class.  He has chosen to side with his plutocrat and oligarch masters.  No matter how hard he tries, he can't polish this turd and must be held accountable.  Perhaps a recall is in his future.  I hope one is.

Expect more of this kind of behavior in the future.  We've already seen how disruptive the do-nothing House of Representatives has been in Washington, DC.  Likewise, the abuse of the filibuster and anonymous member holds in the Senate has further illustrated the plutocrats unwillingness to accept reality and work to help ove this country forward and towards the benefit of all citizens.  As the old boys club Republicans and their oligarch masters start realizeing their backs are against the wall, they will start doing more and more actions like those in Michigan.  They want to keep their power over the rest of us.  Money will flow.  Politicians will be bought and more and more anti-Labor, anti-Choice, anti-Marriage Equality laws will be past in legislatures controlled by conservatives while they still have power.

If these conservative plutocrats are allowed their agendas, we will be further on the path towards corporate and oligarch domination of the common person.  We will continue to work more for less while our corporate overlords continue to try and distract us with phrases like "freedom" and materialistic bangles like iPads and designer jeans.  The United States has been a leader in the fight for Workers' Rights and we must fight to continue our progress toward equal rights for all people.  We must stand in Solidarity!  By allowing Republican plutocrats to behave like they are in Michigan, we will harm the Middle Class and we will further prevent those living in poverty from improving their lives.  Michigan is a call to action!  The game is changing and the push towards laws meant to protect the 1% and their obscene profits off of the backs of workers will increase and we can not afford to sit on the sidelines.  It is up to all of us to write our representatives and let them know behavior like this is unacceptable.  We must boycott.  We need to be ready to prtest.  If forced into the situation by management, we need to be ready to strike.  Remember these insults upon the working poulace of Michigan and the
Country when you go to the voting booth.  Vote these greedy bastards out of office!  We must elect people who are willing to represent all of us regardless of our financial situation.

Friday, November 4, 2011

Get Your Money Out of Banks!

Occupy Albany (Day #1) - Albany, NY - 2011, Oct - 09.jpgIn the past, I've written about the importance of budgeting and being frugal.  Not only does it help you and your family, it works towards depriving the oligarchs their lifeblood -- money.  Today,  Occupy Wallstreet and other activists are promoting another wise way to protect your money and work toward an equitable future for everyone.  Today is Move Your Money Day!

Partially spurred on by the, now dead, move by Bank of America and other banks to charge their customers a monthly fee to use their debit cards (in addition to all the other ridiculous fees they charge), Move Your Money Day was thought up as a way to have people register their disgust with the banks and keep their money local.  As many people know, banks like Bank of America and Wells Fargo took bailout money from the Government after they helped create the financial crisis from which we are currently suffering.  These "too big to fail" banks then proceeded to generate outrageous profits and give enormous bonuses to their 1% officers -- all on the backs of the 99%.

Now, there is nothing wrong, on the face of it, in making profits or giving bonuses.  However, these banks were only able to do so because they took the people's money.  Had they not taken the cash, they would have, if not failed outright, crumbled partially functional bankettes as they would have had to possibly divest to survive.  Sure, they paid the money back BUT they have yet to be held accountable for the damage they have wrought upon the economy of the United States, Europe, and the World!  Seeing how the Government is proving to be spineless when it come to making Wallstreet pay for its crimes and more than happy to give these banks a free pass, it is now up to the people.

How do we get at them?  Through their religion -- the free market.  That's right!  You have a choice and you can take your money out of these "too big to fail" felons and put it into a local banking establishment.  First, you'll be registering your discontent with Bank of America, Wells Fargo, Chase, and their ilk.  Second, you will be helping support your local economy because local banks and credit unions use local money to make local loans.  Third, you will be helping support a much more equitable banking industry over that of the industrial, heartless TARP-fueled banks of the world.

The Union Legion strongly endorses the use of local credit unions.  Your narrator has exclusively used one for many years.  Often, there are requirements which have to be met before you can join but those requirements may only be that you live in a certain area.  In a credit union, you are not a "customer" per se.  You are an owner.  When you join, you deposit a share.  This share is then kept with the bank and you can not withdraw it unless you are leaving the credit union.  Worried about accessing your share?  Don't be.  The share is a low sum -- around $20 or $25.  Once you are a member, you can enjoy many, if not all, of the products commercial banks offer -- but they will be called something different.  For example, CDs are not called CDs -- they are called share certificates at my credit union.  My "checking" account is called a share draft account.  Regardless of their names, these accounts function exactly the same as traditional accounts.  Plus, I have free checking, a free debit card, and I earn interest on both my draft and savings accounts.  Many credit unions also share an ATM network and, wouldn't you know it, they don't charge ATM access fees!

Even if you feel a credit union isn't the right answer for you, there are still local, traditional banks.  Again, these banks keep your money local but, most importantly, they aren't responsible for the economic mess everyone is slogging through.  As technology has improved these small banks have proven they too can provide the services of the big monster banks.

Don't get worried about moving your money.  It is a fairly simple process.  Take this point of advise though -- do your research first and know the features of your prospective new bank.  Then, open your new, local account first and link up your bill payments and direct deposits before you move your money.  Otherwise, you may run into some automated headaches later in the month when your rent isn't automatically paid.  Once your new account is set up, close out your account with the "too big to fail" bank.  I would even go so far as to encourage you to politely tell them why.  When finished, you will be saving more of your hard earned cash, keeping your money local to do local work, taking control over your money away from the "too big to fail" banks, and doing your part to let the wealthiest 1% know there will be an accounting for their actions.

Saturday, October 29, 2011

Sunday, August 7, 2011

STRIKE! CWA 1118 is on Strike Against Verizon

Verizon has refused to negotiate with the members of CWA 1118 and CWA's membership has been forced to strike.

Come out and support your fellow Workers and stand against big business choosing profits over people!