Wednesday, January 1, 2020

Labor in The Office - Pilot

It’s my understanding Ricky Gervais was involved with the production of the first 3 episodes of The Office. As far a I know he was a writer for the pilot as well. From an ignorant couch potato perspective, I can say it certainly looks to be consistent with the other episodes. I guess it would make sense. It is his show, after all. Regardless of the writers and producers involved, the pilot introduces the viewers to themes which would be consistently addressed throughout the entire series.

The choice of Scranton, Pennsylvania is ideal. A working-class city which has already shouldered its share of deindustrialization would provided a good stage for a series taking place just before and during the economic downturn of the Great Recession. Additionally, Dunder Mifflin, the company the show focuses on, is confronting technological changes on two different fronts. Not only was paper becoming less important for businesses as electric communication and record keeping became more prevalent, big-box stores were stealing market share from smaller businesses. In other words, The Office takes place in a time and place where the exploitation of workers was great and it provides an ideal canvass to portray working-class problems. Mr. Gervais, if you’re ever unfortunate enough to read my ramblings, I’d like to pitch a series about the Luddites. They dealt with related problems. Well, at least they were contending with exploitation and technology changes. I doubt they had as clean hair.

One of the topics dealt with series-wide is embodied by the character, Ryan. Ryan is a contract, or “temp,” employee. Temporary employees are part of what is now referred to as the Precariate – people whose employment exists in a precarious state (precarious + proletariat = precariate) and, as a result are vulnerable to degrees of exploitation against which regular employees are better shielded. For example, members of the precariate have lower compensation and little or no health insurance coverage – making them more susceptible to wage theft and other forms of exploitation because interruptions to their income are much more destructive. Members of the precariate typically have little to no savings or safety net and are much less likely to be able to stand up for themselves simply because, as individuals, they have little to no power over their working conditions and can’t risk getting fired.

As the viewers are introduced to Ryan, they are also made aware Dunder Mifflin is downsizing. One would be right to ask, “Why is the company downsizing on one hand while bringing on temp workers on the other?” Good question. Does or doesn’t the work need to be done? Truth is the work needs to be done but Dunder Mifflin doesn’t want to pay for it. By contracting out temp employees instead of maintaining it’s workforce or hiring another employee, they free themselves of having to pay health insurance, unemployment insurance and other things afforded to regular employees under labor law. Plus, disposing of temp employees they might find problematic, for whatever reason – trivial or serious, is almost as simple as replacing a used printer cartridge. Humans become an expendable resource. Protections were won for workers by unions and through a history of conflict between the working-class and capitalists who seek to exploit their labor. Dunder Mifflin is looking to take its workforce back to the state experienced during the “Golden Era” (of exploitation) when capitalists like Andrew Carnegie treated their employees like chattel with few or no protections. People had to die for there to be an eight hour work day.

On-the-job abuse is distinctly evident. Although he would go on to be developed into a more likable character, Michael, the Branch Manager, is revealed to be an abusive boss. While job-site abuse can take many forms – and will throughout the series – Michael’s misogyny is front and center in the pilot. When Michael introduces the receptionist, Pam, her response to his sexist and insulting behavior clearly indicates she is not in a position to correct it nor does it appear he’d be willing or able to hear the criticism. If the office was unionized all the workers would have had means to take collective action on Pam’s behalf. Whether through a grievance process or direct action, she and her fellow workers would be able to confront Michael and ultimately put an end to it. His misogyny isn’t confined to his subordinates, either. We learn he has a problem with having a female superior during his meeting with Jan (which includes a call from the character, Packer, that includes the portmanteau “Godhillary”). I’d certainly be negligent if I also didn’t point out Michael misgenders someone as he’s initially introduced to the audience. For women, having him as a supervisor must be a nightmare. Regrettably, the women in office suffer from an endemic problem.

Another theme throughout the entire series is what I like to call the “friend-boss.” Michael reinforces multiple times how he wants to be perceived as a friend before he’s seen as a boss. While the idea of a friendly supervisor is appealing, a friend-boss is often used tactically to prevent improving working conditions, solidarity actions, or unionization. Various forms of the friend-boss range from so-called “open door” policies to outright emotional manipulation. In Michael’s case, we observe invasion of personal space, inappropriate jokes, and confusing informal/interpersonal venting about pay as a work-related discussion – to which he reacts poorly. In The Office, Michael is seen as someone who doesn’t recognize boundaries. In the real world, when boundaries between work and home-life are blurred, rarely do things work with the home-life creeping into work-life. It always goes the other way. Ask anyone who telecommutes, has to carry a company phone, or is required to answer calls and respond to emails regardless of time of day or what they might be doing (not to mention those ensnared in the “gig” economy). Friend-bosses see no problem in invading their employees personal time. After all, aren’t they all family? This dynamic is significant in the series. While it makes for entertaining television, it isn’t good for a healthy work/life balance.

Racism and institutional sexism also rear their ugly heads. As there are ample opportunities to discuss them further in other episodes, I’ll only mention their presence. I’ll also point out both can be protected against through worker solidarity and unionization. If you see something in the episode you feel is noteworthy or if there is something you would like me to focus on for other episodes, feel free to contact me at @unionlegion on Twitter or email me at union.legion (at) nym.hush.com.

Up next: Diversity Day